Saturday, 4 May 2013

A critical deconstruction of the song "Thrift Shop"

I'm gonna pop some tags
Only got twenty dollars in my pocket
I - I - I'm hunting, looking for a come-up
This is fucking awesome

Unless you've been living under a rock for the past year, you've probably heard the song "Thrift Shop" by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis. In this post we ask: are the artists promoting Tight Fist principles or simply making fun of frugality?

Upon a first listen, the answer isn't totally clear. The song is all about shopping around for deals and getting bargains, which is generally positive. But it also promotes unnecessary consumption, and could be interpreted as trying to score humor points on being poor. (The latter criticism can be squarely aimed at the TV show "Two Broke Girls", which simply sucks and deserves no deconstruction.)

As have written here, a common pitfall is for people to be tricked into purchasing things they don't need in the name of a discount. It would certainly be difficult to justify Macklemore's "need" to purchase some of the items he mentions:

They had a broken keyboard, I bought a broken keyboard
I bought a skeet blanket, then I bought a kneeboard

The song also explains that Macklemore wants to look great, and cares heavily about how he is perceived by others. It would be easy to accuse him of Kanye-esque self-doubt, compensated by consumption:

Nah, walk up to the club like, "What up? I got a big cock!"
I'm so pumped about some shit from the thrift shop

Under this interpretation, Macklemore wants to look as good as he can but is simply constrained by resources and is taking some humor out of his poor circumstance.

They key lies in analyzing the counter-factual: if Macklemore had more than $20 in his pocket, would he still shop at the thrift shop? Fortunately, the second verse provides some insight:

They be like, "Oh, that Gucci - that's hella tight."
I'm like, "Yo - that's fifty dollars for a T-shirt."
Limited edition, let's do some simple addition
Fifty dollars for a T-shirt - that's just some ignorant bitch (shit)
I call that getting swindled and pimped (shit)
I call that getting tricked by a business

I'd say this proves that Macklemore's love of his thrift shop finds is genuine, and that he'll continue to rock his "flannel zebra jammies" once he has more income (which he definitely does now that "Thift Shop" became a runaway hit).

Overall, the conclusion is that although it does promote a bit of overconsumption, "Thift Shop" is mostly consistent with Tight Fist principles, and actually might have the ability to influence some young minds. And for those young minds still worried about the costs of a Tight Fist lifestye, don't forget this gem of wisdom:

Peep game, come take a look through my telescope
Tryna get girls from a brand? Man you hella won't

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Non-essential Book Review: Scroogenomics

Scrooge says: Hoarding is so much more fun than gift-giving!

This is a nice time of year to be a practicing Tight Fister. Yes, this is the time of year when we can just sit  back and relax while out less enlightened friends waste their time and money in crowded, soulless temples of commercialism (aka shopping malls). While the subject of how to deal with gift-giving traditions has already been covered in old posts (here and here), a new book, Scroogenomics: "Why You Shouldn't Buy Presents for the Holidays," covers much of the same ground, adding some very light numerical analysis to the mix.

As all of you know, I would never recommend that anyone ever buy a book. Therefore, as my Christmas present to all of you, I'm going to just summarize the main points, and then none of you need bother to read it.

The main argument is that gift giving is economically inefficient. Common sense (and some experiments conducted by the author) tell us that on average, people value gifts around 20% less than gift givers spent on them. (I mean really, how much do you value your 37th tie?) So basically, the practice of gift giving creates gigantic waste in the economy, which the author estimates at $12 million.  Now, did you actually need a whole book to make that simple argument? Clearly no, but the author belabors the point for 186 pages.

There are a few interesting tidbits along the way. Although giving cash is clearly the most efficient gift, people don't tend to give cash due to a kind of 'cash stigma' perceived from cash gifts. For gift-givers who don't know the preferences of their recipients well (such as grandparents), their gifts tend to be the least efficient, and therefore tend to give cash more. Taking a bunch of questionable survey data, he estimates the 'cash stigma' to be equal to around $4 plus half the amount of cash given. Therefore a gift of $100 is valued at only $46 due to the stigma of receiving cash. Sucks, huh?

One way to square the circle here appears to be with gift cards. Well-planned gift cards can be a very good substitute for cash, but carry almost no stigma.

Well, there you go: ample reason to stop gift-exchanging. I know you will all take it to heart, because if can't trust a nerdy economist rambling on about efficiency, who can you trust?

Thursday, 20 December 2012

Ask the Tight Fist: Saving on Moving Costs

Even works for Moving to Atlantis

Dear The Tight Fist,

Love the blog; I'm getting ready to move and was wondering how I can apply your principles to moving, which can be so expensive.

Any tips?


Sarah in Houston (soon to be San Antonio)

Dear Sarah,

Shame on you: you have clearly not been following Tight Fist principles. If you had, moving would be a breeze as you would own hardly any possessions and no furniture worth moving. Over the last 7 years The Tight Fist has lived in 8 places in four countries. Total moving costs: 0 (beyond the cost of moving myself.) Yes, when all your life fits into two bags, so many things just simplify. 

But I'm going to assume that you have been naughty over the years: slowly acquiring furniture, dishes, electronics, and other modern vices that you just can't part with. 

It's here that you might expect a lengthy comparison of different options for moving your stuff: movers, shipping, those weird pods, etc. But really, this will just waste everyone's time. All the options are stupid expensive except for just renting a truck and driving yourself. A quick look on Budget shows you can get a moving truck for a day and drive it from Houston to San Antonio for around $75. Not too shabby.

Hold on. You honestly expect me to believe that social
protocol dictates we break our backs helping Wolowitz move,
and then he only need buy us a pizza?

But, you say, how can a young lady be expected to haul couches and dressers by herself? Well, that's where a wonderful social equation comes into play: Pizza = Moving. That's right, your burly male friends are required by covenant of friendship to do a day's worth of manual labor with only pizza (and maybe some beer) in return. 

So with pizza and beer on both ends, we're talking about around $125 bucks for your move. Not bad.

But what if you have no burly friends to come to your rescue? Well, fortunately in Texas "friends" are easy to purchase, standing each day outside of Home Depot. You might have to pay your new amigo a bit more than the price of a pizza, but not too much.

Enjoy your move!